Kemitraan Pemerintah dan Kelompok Tenun Ikat Sikka Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Ekonomi Kreatif (Studi Dinas Perdagangan, Koperasi, dan UKM Kabupaten Sikka)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pola kemitraan antara Pemerintah Daerah melalui Dinas Perdagangan, Koperasi, dan UKM Kabupaten Sikka dengan kelompok pengrajin tenun ikat sebagai salah satu upaya pengembangan ekonomi kreatif berbasis budaya lokal. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan dukungan analisis SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats) untuk mengetahui posisi strategis dan arah pengembangan tenun ikat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemitraan yang terjalin bersifat fasilitatif meliputi penyediaan bahan baku, pendampingan produksi, pelatihan keterampilan, serta dukungan akses pemasaran. Analisis SWOT menghasilkan skor IFAS sebesar 3,511 dan EFAS sebesar 3,586, yang menempatkan posisi tenun ikat sikka pada kuadran II (strategi diversifikasi). Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun memiliki kekuatan internal berupa dukungan pemerintah, jaringan pemasaran, serta nilai budaya sebagai identitas daerah, pengembangan tenun ikat tetap dihadapkan pada ancaman eksternal seperti persaingan produk pabrikan, fluktuasi harga bahan baku, dan minimnya regenerasi penenun muda. Penelitian ini menyarankan strategi diversifikasi produk, penguatan regulasi, optimalisasi digital marketing, serta kemitraan multi-aktor agar pengembangan tenun ikat dapat lebih berdaya saing, berkelanjutan, dan memberikan kontribusi bagi kesejahteraan masyarakat sikka.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".