MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416426515 · doi:10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100618

Epigenetic alterations in rotator cuff tendinopathy and degenerative cuff tears: a systematic review

2025· article· en· W4416426515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bret Hatzinger, Dane R.G. Lind, Nick A. Felan, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Grant J. Dornan, Johnny Huard, Peter J. Millett

Bibliographic record

VenueJSES Reviews Reports and Techniques · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCrown Family Philanthropies
KeywordsRotator cuffEpigeneticsTendinopathyPathophysiologyCuffTendon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy and degenerative cuff tears are common, disabling conditions with a complex molecular etiology. Furthermore, RC pathology becomes increasingly common with age, especially in the case of supraspinatus tendon injury. Concurrent with increased RC pathology during aging are epigenetic alterations, which makes the relationship between RC pathology and epigenetic alterations an area of interest. The role of epigenetics in RC pathology is still being elucidated but has potential to provide diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We aimed to systematically review the altered epigenetic signatures and mechanisms underlying RC pathology. Methods: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase.com, Cochrane, and Google Scholar) were searched 27 August, 2024, for primary studies reporting on epigenetic alterations (DNA methylation, histone modifications, noncoding RNAs) in RC tendinopathy and associated atraumatic cuff tear tissue. Risk of bias and methodological quality of all included studies were assessed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Results: Of the 1,190 identified references, 39 studies were included, totaling 464 human and 641 animal model participant shoulders. We identified altered expression of 87 microRNAs, 24 of which were reported on in multiple studies, 62 long noncoding RNAs, 26 circular RNAs, 9 histone modifications or histone-modifying enzymes, and 11 genes exhibiting altered DNA methylation within the disease state. Epigenetic signatures were most commonly associated with inflammation, extracellular matrix degeneration, muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration. We also report on 15 studies characterizing epigenetic therapeutics (5 microRNA, 1 long noncoding RNA, 3 histone-modifying enzymes, and 6 gene silencing RNA). Conclusion: Our findings indicate that epigenetic regulation may play an important role in the pathophysiology of RC tendinopathy and degenerative tear and that there is a high potential for epigenetic biomarkers and therapeutics to aid in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of this condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.601

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJSES Reviews Reports and TechniquesSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207