MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416443125 · doi:10.5376/gab.2025.16.0004

Phylogenetic Position of Durian and Comparative Genomics with Close Relatives in Malvaceae

2025· article· W4416443125 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGenomics and Applied Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicCocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhylogenetic treeMalvaceaeGenomeComparative genomicsGenomicsGene familyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Durio zibethinus Murr . is a famous tropical fruit tree of the Mallow family. It is known as the "king of fruits" for its unique and strong odor and high economic value. This study reviews the phylogenetic location of durian in the Malvaceae family, and a comparative analysis of related species of durian and Malvaceae family based on the latest genomics research. Through comparative genomic analysis, it was found that the genomic collinearity of durian and Malvaceae remained conservative in genomic collinearity, but there were also chromosomal rearrangements and gene families. We also compared the evolution of key functional genes of durian and its relative species: the ethylene signal and secondary metabolic pathway genes related to durian fruit maturation showed unique expression and evolutionary patterns, and the disease-resistant and stress-responsive genes also had copy number variation and selection pressure differences among different species. Case analysis shows that the genomes of durian and cocoa (Theobroma cacao) are similar in overall structure but different in scale, and durian and kapok ( Bombax   Ceiba ) are phylogenetically closer, sharing some conserved gene clusters. The end of this study looks forward to the application prospects of durian genome research in variety improvement. Based on the research progress in the past five years, we have deepened our understanding of the genome evolution of durian and its related species, which will provide a scientific basis for the genetic improvement of durian and the development and utilization of plant resources in the Malvaceae family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it