MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416448186 · doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02434

First case of bloodstream infection caused by Cupriavidus metallidurans in Japan

2025· article· en· W4416448186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kozi Hosoya, Satomi Takei, Naoya Ogura, Ayako Nakamura, Hidenori Yoshii, Tomomi Matsubara, Tadashi Miyazaki

Bibliographic record

VenueIDCases · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInfections and bacterial resistance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywords16S ribosomal RNABloodstream infectionGram stainingAntibioticsBacteremiaPhylogenetic treeBlood cultureRibosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the first case in Japan of a bloodstream infection caused by Cupriavidus metallidurans . The patient was a 77 years old man hospitalized for treatment of heart failure and diabetes. On day 83 of hospitalization, he developed a fever of 38.0°C, followed three days later by an elevation in C-reactive protein. His condition improved with the administration of cefmetazole, cefepime, and levofloxacin, and antibiotic therapy was discontinued on day 17. Blood cultures collected at the onset of fever revealed growth in the aerobic bottle after 21 h, and Gram staining revealed slightly slender Gram-negative rods. Based on colony morphology, Burkholderia or Ralstonia was initially suspected. However, identification kit ID Test NF-18 yielded multiple possible organisms, and a definitive identification could not be made. The isolate was ultimately identified as C. metallidurans by phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene. Because this species is not included in general bacterial identification kits and cannot be reliably distinguished based biochemical characteristics alone, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was essential for diagnosis. To date, only five cases of bloodstream infection caused by this species have been reported, in Canada and Italy, and this is the first reported case in Japan. As this bacterium is present in the Japanese environment, reports of its detection may increase in the future, particularly among elderly or immunocompromised patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIDCasesSame topicInfections and bacterial resistanceFrench-language works237,207