MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416448791 · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2025.11.005

A smoothing method for DNA methylome analysis to enhance epigenomic signature detection in epigenome-wide association studies

2025· article· en· W4416448791 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abderrahim Oussalah, Loris Mousel, David‐Alexandre Trégouët, Jean‐Louis Guéant

Bibliographic record

VenueMethods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsSmoothingCpG siteDNA methylationBayes' theoremEpigenomicsMethylationPattern recognition (psychology)Noise (video)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epigenome‐wide association studies (EWAS) are instrumental for mapping DNA methylation changes in human traits and diseases but often suffer from low statistical power and false positives, especially in small cohorts. We developed an EWAS smoothing method that exploits co‐methylation of adjacent CpG probes within CpG islands via a sliding‐window average and generalized it using Savitzky-Golay filtering. We applied the smoothing approach—with window widths of 1–3 CpGs and, for generalization, Savitzky-Golay filters of varying polynomial orders and window sizes—across five distinct EWAS settings. Performance was quantified by signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR), noise‐variance reduction, variance ratio (VR), Bayes factors, and sample‐size sensitivity. In the MMACHC epimutation dataset, a 5‐CpG window (width, w = 2) increased SNR by 90 %, reduced noise variance by 80 %, and elevated VR by 176 % at the target CpG island, with no genome‐wide false positives. For MLH1 , smoothing preserved the top association and suppressed background signals. In the aging EWAS, a “Polyepigenetic CpG aging score” was derived following smoothing. This score correlated strongly with chronological age in the discovery cohort (Spearman’s ρ = 0.89; P = 3.0 × 10 −219 ) and was independently validated in a separate dataset, significantly distinguishing newborns from nonagenarians ( P = 3.4 × 10 −8 ). Savitzky-Golay filtering of order 0 with a 5‐CpG window yielded optimal SNR across bootstrap iterations, supporting this configuration as a robust choice for methylation array smoothing. As an extension of the Savitzky-Golay-based smoothing framework, reanalysis of a liver cancer dataset identified five top loci surpassing a smoothed P -value threshold of 1 × 10 −8 . Among these, MIR10A within the HOXB3 locus was the only previously reported functionally relevant site. In conclusion, the smoothing method improves EWAS performance by enhancing SNR, enabling detection of meaningful associations even in small cohorts, and offers a valuable tool for reanalyzing existing Infinium methylation array datasets to uncover previously undetected epigenomic signatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.887

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.402 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMethodsSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207