MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416469619 · doi:10.1136/spcare-2025-huk.163

P-146 Testing a 72 hr discharge nurse model at barnsley hospice

2025· article· W4416469619 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Bowness, Ross Fletcher, Justyna Machalica, Becky Lambert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeelingAnxietyPalliative careCare pathwayQuality of life (healthcare)Patient discharge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the project was to support patients’ transition home, enabling a safe discharge and reducing readmission rates alongside reducing length of stay. The method used was a three-day pathway, where identified patients were placed on a three-day support package, where McGill QoL Expanded and IPOS scores were measured through SystmOne care plans post discharge. Nurses would follow up these patients through daily telephone calls noting/actioning any change. The results noted were that IPOS outcomes have improved for the pathway patients, in comparison to the average discharge data for non-pathway patients, reporting less severe levels of pain and reduced shortness of breath. No change has been reflected in communication, yet anxiety is less severe alongside improvement in the feeling of peacefulness. 28% of discharged patients in 2024/25 were placed on this scheme, this resulted in 41 more bed days being available to support other patients requiring specialist palliative and end of life care. We concluded that patients placed on the pathway had a very low Karnofsky score and high length of stay, as compared to patients not on the pathway, indicating that these patients were more complex. The support this pathway gave has reduced readmission rates down by 42% in 2024/25 compared to 2023/24, with readmission rates dropping to 8.7% compared to 15% in 2023/24 and patients’ Preferred Placed of Care increasing to 94% at the end of 2024/2025. Fourteen patients consented to take part in the 72-hour discharge were placed on the pathway, 13 patients were discharged after day 3 and one patient was readmitted on day 2 due to new symptoms and deterioration, requiring hospice inpatient management. This study successfully addressed the aims and prevented unnecessary hospital admissions, supported community care teams and enabled patient choice, despite complexities, through holistic management. Funded by St. James’s Place Charitable Foundation grant, managed by Hospice UK.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues→French-language works237,207→