MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416470652 · doi:10.3390/logistics9040164

A Data-Driven Framework for Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Case Study on Inventory Optimization in Colombian Potatoes Management

2025· article· en· W4416470652 on OpenAlexaff
D.P. Rojas, Jairo R. Montoya‐Torres, Diana M. Ayala Valderrama

Bibliographic record

VenueLogistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersUniversidad de La Sabana
KeywordsSupply chainNewsvendor modelProfitability indexFood securityVariety (cybernetics)AnalyticsAgricultureSupply and demandKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Mitigating the negative impacts of climate change and ensuring food security are critical challenges for sustainable development. Potato crops play a key role in global food security, and optimizing their supply chains can improve yields, reduce waste, and stabilize farmer incomes. This study focuses on the potato supply chain in Boyacá, Colombia, aiming to maximize profitability for smallholder farmers through a data-driven approach. Methods: We developed a hybrid framework combining the newsvendor model, Monte Carlo simulation, and machine learning to optimize inventory decisions under uncertain demand and price conditions. Historical data on potato demand and prices were analyzed to fit probability distributions, and simulation scenarios were run for three main potato varieties. Results: The results show that integrating these methods improves inventory decision-making, with the Criolla Colombia variety yielding positive profitability, while the Diacol Capiro and Pastusa Suprema varieties incur losses under current market conditions. The machine learning model enhances predictive accuracy and supports dynamic planning. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate the potential of advanced analytics to reduce waste, support sustainable practices, and inform agricultural policy. The proposed methodology offers a practical decision-support tool for stakeholders and can be adapted to other crops and regions facing similar operational challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLogisticsSame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207