MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416500392 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.14.022

EFFECT OF TOURNIQUET ON LOCAL TISSUE CONCENTRATIONS OF CEFAZOLIN DURING TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

2025· article· en· W4416500392 on OpenAlexaffabout
Simon Martel, Jean Montreuil, Michael Tänzer, Yu Ling Zhang, Ewa Rajda, Daina Avizonis, Adam Hart

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCefazolinPeriprostheticTourniquetTotal knee arthroplastyArthroplastyRandomized controlled trialAntibioticsSoft tissue

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prophylactic administration of intravenous antibiotics prior to skin incision is arguably the most important measure to prevent periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in arthroplasty surgery. To be effective, the local tissue concentration (LTC) of antibiotic must exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of typical infecting organisms. However, the LTC of Cefazolin during arthroplasty surgeries remains poorly understood. Our aim was to compare the systemic concentration of Cefazolin in serum with the LTC in fat, synovium and bone during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) while assessing the impact of tourniquet inflation. A prospective randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2022 June 2023 at a single Canadian academic center. Sixty-one consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were randomized, and 59 patients were included in the analysis. Patients were randomized to TKA surgery perfromed with or without a limb tourniquet. Systemic blood and local tissues from the surgical site (fat, synovium and bone) were harvested at regular intervals during the surgery. The concentration of Cefazolin was quantified using a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technique. In patients undergoing TKA without a tourniquet, the mean concentration of Cefazolin in the serum was 71.9 ug/ml (SD 32.7) whereas the LTC in fat, synovium, and bone was 13.9 ug/g (8.6), 27.7 ug/g (12.6) and 17.7 ug/g (9.9), respectively. For patients undergoing TKA with a tourniquet, the mean concentration of Cefazolin in serum was 72.0 ug/ml (SD 32.6), while the LTC in fat, synovium, and bone was 9.9 ug/g (5.7), 21.8 ug/g (11.3) and 13.0 ug/g (7.7) respectively. The use of a tourniquet resulted in significantly lower LTCs in fat, synovium and bone by 60 minutes after cefazolin infusion (Fat p=0.001, Synovium p=0.03, Bone=0.007). The concentration of Cefazolin was found to be much lower in local tissues (fat, synovium and bone) than in systemic blood and the use of a limb tourniquet further significantly reduced these concentrations. Although the current prophylactic dosing regimen for Cefazolin provides sufficient serum concentrations, the levels in the local periarticular tissue during TKA may be insufficient to prevent PJI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207