MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416505888 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1665996

Retrospective study of clinically relevant maxillary and mandibular anatomy in all skull types of dogs and cats

2025· article· en· W4416505888 on OpenAlexaff
Erinn Schellenberg, Candace Lowe

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVeterinary Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaxillary nerveMaxillary sinusMolarCATSInfraorbital nerveSkullNerve blockMandible (arthropod mouthpart)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In this retrospective study, computed tomography (CT) imaging was used to examine skull types of cats and dogs to provide clinically useful information for improved patient safety, regarding ocular trauma and hemorrhage control during dental nerve block administration, extraction of the caudal maxillary teeth, and caudal maxillectomy or mandibulectomy. Materials and methods: CT imaging was used to examine the images of 193 dogs and 41 cats, which were divided into mesocephalic (≤5, 6-10, and ≥11 kg), brachycephalic (≤10 and ≥11 kg), dolichocephalic (≤10 and ≥11 kg) dogs, and mesocephalic and brachycephalic cats. Descriptive statistics were calculated for infraorbital canal length, width and height, shortest distances for infraorbital foramen to globe, maxillary foramen to globe, and maxillary first and second molar tooth root apex to globe in dogs, and apices of the maxillary fourth premolar tooth to globe in cats, palate to maxillary foramen, palate to globe, and mandibular molar to mandibular foramen in all cats and dogs. Values were tabulated and combined into reference materials to aid veterinarians in making safer clinical decisions. Results: The shortest maxillary molar tooth root apex-to-globe minimum value was 2.1mm in mesocephalic ≤5kg dogs. The shortest minimum palate-to-globe distance was 5.3mm in mesocephalic dogs of 6-10kg. The minimum maxillary fourth premolar tooth root apex-to-globe distances ranged from 1.6-2.8mm in all cats. Accidental globe puncture through the infraorbital canal was possible in 100% of cats and dolichocephalic ≤10kg dogs, and between 81-95% of mesocephalic dogs weighing 10kg or less. Conclusion: Caution should be taken when performing infraorbital and maxillary nerve blocks in mesocephalic and dolichocephalic dogs ≤10 kg and all cats. Using proper technique, brachycephalic ≥11kg dogs may be at lower risk of accidental globe trauma during infraorbital nerve block. The deep maxillary nerve block should not be used in cats or small dogs. The maxillary nerve block, using the modified infraorbital canal approach, combined with the author's recommended safe needle/catheter insertion distances should provide safe, effective analgesia administration. Mean measurements for mandibular molar to mandibular foramen, and maxillary molar to maxillary foramen may be used for surgical planning and ligation for hemostasis for caudal mandibulectomies and maxillectomies, particularly when CT imaging is not available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicVeterinary Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207