MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416513050 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5783111

Design and Validation of Locally Resonant Metaplate with Tunable Bandgaps for Inertial Sensors

2025· preprint· W4416513050 on OpenAlexaff
Hanya Asim, Atkin D. Hyatt, Dalziel J. Wilson, Mohammed Jalal Ahamed

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttenuationMetamaterialFinite element methodBroadbandPlanarBand gapVibrationOmnidirectional antennaTransmission (telecommunications)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The design, optimization, and experimental characterization of a tapered lamina emergent torsional (LET) spring architecture-based metaplate are presented. The metaplate is engineered to achieve a low-frequency, broadband elastic bandgap for noise and vibration isolation within a compact, monolithic unit cell. Transmission of elastic waves is passively suppressed in both in-plane and out-of-plane directions, enabling three-dimensional wave attenuation in a planar structure. A prototype metaplate is fabricated using single-material 3D printing for experimental validation. Experimental results demonstrate attenuation levels of approximately − 40 dB for out-of-plane excitation and − 20 dB for in-plane excitation. The bandgap is also experimentally tuned to exhibit a relative bandgap width of approximately 48% in the sub-kHz range. This approach provides an alternative to traditional locally resonant or multilayered metamaterial platforms by validating a planar LET-based bandgap mechanism at the millimetre scale. The resulting geometry framework can be adapted for future microscale implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicAcoustic Wave Phenomena ResearchFrench-language works237,207