MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416513631 · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3636020

MantleMark: Migrating Watermarks From Multi-View Images to Radiance Fields via Frequency Modulation

2025· article· W4416513631 on OpenAlexaff
Ziyuan Luo, Jun Liu, Haoliang Li, Anderson Rocha, Renjie Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsDigital watermarkingRadianceWatermarkRepresentation (politics)Iterative reconstructionKey (lock)Modulation (music)Gaussian

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-view images are essential for modern radiance field reconstruction methods like Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS). While image watermarking is a crucial data protection and ownership verification technique, it faces unprecedented challenges in multi-view scenarios. Traditional 2D watermarking techniques often fail to maintain detectability in rendered views, while existing 3D watermarking methods are typically limited to specific reconstruction methods and require access to the reconstruction process. To address these limitations, we propose MantleMark, a watermarking framework that migrates watermarks from multi-view images to radiance fields via frequency modulation. Our key insight is constructing a mantle-like Frequency-domain Watermarking Representation in 3D frequency space, which can be projected to create view-dependent watermarking patterns. Relying upon the Fourier Projection-Slice Theorem, we embed these patterns through magnitude spectrum modulation in the image frequency domain, enabling watermarks to migrate into 3D representations. This approach ensures watermark detectability in rendered views regardless of the reconstruction methods used by adversaries. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves robust watermark detection while maintaining high visual quality across various radiance field-based reconstruction methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and SecuritySame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207