Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia worldwide. Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), a neurotropic virus capable of establishing lifelong latency in the CNS, has been suggested as a potential risk factor in the pathogenesis of AD. However, studies investigating this association have reported inconsistent findings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore this association further and shed light on the matter. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze existing literature to assess the association between HHV-6 infection and the risk of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, and grey literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Case-control studies that assessed the presence of HHV-6 in patients with Alzheimer's disease were included. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and STATA 17.0. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess heterogeneity and robustness of the results. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, trim-and-fill analysis, and Begg's test. RESULTS: Eight case-control studies comprising 1,507 participants were included. The pooled analysis revealed a significant association between HHV-6 infection and increased risk of Alzheimer's [OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.16-2.84, p = 0.009], with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 60%). Sensitivity analysis excluding one outlier strengthened the association [OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 1.65-4.70] and eliminated heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated stronger associations in studies using PCR detection [OR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.22-3.98] and brain tissue samples [OR = 2.49, 95% CI: 1.22-5.11], whereas serological and blood-based studies yielded weaker, non-significant associations. Publication bias was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggests that HHV-6 infection is significantly associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. Nevertheless, the exact causal mechanisms remain unclear. Further longitudinal and mechanistic studies are needed to better understand the role of HHV-6 in Alzheimer's pathogenesis and to evaluate potential antiviral options for preventive or therapeutic strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".