The Indirect Effect of a Brief Couple Intervention on Child Mental Health Challenges via the Interparental Relationship
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Child mental health challenges have long-term implications for social and emotional functioning. The quality of the interparental relationship is an important contributor to children's mental health challenges. Evidence supports the use of brief couple interventions to enhance couple functioning, though secondary benefits to child outcomes are unknown. The current study examines whether changes to the interparental relationship following participation in a brief couple intervention, in turn, lead to changes in child mental health challenges. METHODS: Participants come from a secondary dataset from a randomized controlled trial of Love Together, Parent Together, a brief couple intervention, and included 267 parents (140 couples) with at least one child under 6 years old. Parents reported on 10 indicators of the interparental relationship and their child's mental health challenges at baseline, 1 week post-intervention and 1- and 3-month follow-ups. RESULTS: Based on an exploratory factor analysis including all 10 indicators of the interparental relationship, a two-factor model emerged, which included interparental conflict and general relationship quality. Structural equation modelling was used to test indirect effects with interparental conflict and relationship quality, respectively, as mediators, and child mental health challenges at 1- and 3-month follow-ups, respectively, as outcomes. The intervention did not significantly predict couples' T2 conflict, nor did T2 conflict predict follow-up child mental health challenges. The intervention significantly improved the couples' T2 relationship quality, though there were no reliable effects found on child mental health challenges. CONCLUSIONS: In sum, though findings are consistent with the idea that conflict and relationship quality are unique factors of the interparental relationship, there is no evidence for benefits of a brief couple intervention to child mental health challenges. Future studies should carefully consider measurement selection and assessment schedules to detect developmental cascades following couple interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".