MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416542252 · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.5c00670

Absolute Membrane Potential Recording with ASAP-Type Genetically Encoded Voltage Indicators Using Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging

2025· article· en· W4416542252 on OpenAlexaff
Anagha G. Nair, Marko Rodewald, Hyeonsoo Bae, Philipp Rühl, Jürgen Popp, Michael Schmitt, Tobias Meyer‐Zedler, Stefan H. Heinemann

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Chemical Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
FundersLeibniz-GemeinschaftBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutscher Akademischer AustauschdienstEuropean Regional Development FundUniversitätsklinikum JenaFreistaat ThüringenDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftFriedrich-Schiller-Universität JenaSimons Foundation
KeywordsFluorescenceFluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopyMembrane potentialFluorescence microscopeMicroscopyVoltageMembraneFörster resonance energy transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The electrical membrane voltage ( V m ) characterizes the functional state of biological cells, thus requiring precise, noninvasive V m -sensing techniques. While voltage-dependent fluorescence intensity changes from genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) indicate V m changes, variability in sensor expression confounds the determination of absolute V m . Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) promises a solution to this problem, as fluorescence lifetime is expected to be unaffected by sensor expression and excitation intensity. By examining ASAP1, ASAP3, JEDI-1P, rEstus, and rEstus-NI (G138N:T141I) with one-photon-excited FLIM measurements, we demonstrate that all sensors display a voltage-dependent lifetime. Based on the highest lifetime change in the V m range of −120 to 60 mV, rEstus-NI (798 ps) and ASAP3 (726 ps) are preferred for FLIM recordings. At a physiologically relevant V m of −30 mV, the voltage sensitivity of rEstus-NI (6.6 ps/mV) is 3.6 and 1.4 times greater than that of ASAP1 and rEstus, respectively. As a proof of concept, we successfully used rEstus-NI to estimate absolute resting V m in HEK293T, A375 melanoma, and MCF7 breast cancer cells and quantified spontaneous V m fluctuations in A375 cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Chemical NeuroscienceSame topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207