MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416544318 · doi:10.47310/jpms2025141005

Influence of Smoking on the Color Stability and Longevity of Restored Discolored Teeth with Dental Crowns: A Systematic Review

2025· article· W4416544318 on OpenAlex
Loulwa Khaled Alwabel, Laila Mohammed Alanazi, Deena Abdullah Al Awwad, Fatimah Baqer Al Dhahi, Wateen Mohammed Alabduljabar, Rayan Abdullah Albader, Malik Saad, B. Alghamdi Ahmed Saad

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pioneering Medical Science · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldDentistry
TopicDental materials and restorations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservational studyLongevityCochrane LibraryDental ceramicsCrown (dentistry)Systematic reviewRandomized controlled trialClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Smoking is a well-established risk factor affecting oral health, yet its specific influence on the color stability and longevity of dental crowns restoring discolored teeth remains under- investigated. This systematic review explores how various smoking modalities, including conventional cigarettes and electronic alternatives, impact restorative materials. Objective: To evaluate the influence of smoking on the color stability and longevity of dental crowns used in the restoration of discolored teeth. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, ScienceDirect, the Cochrane Library and Google Scholar up to [6/1/2025]. Studies involving human participants or in vitro models that assessed the impact of smoking on dental crowns in terms of color change (ΔE) or longevity were included. Data were extracted and synthesized narratively due to heterogeneity. Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising primarily in vitro experiments with some observational data. Conventional cigarette smoke (CS) consistently caused clinically unacceptable discoloration (ΔE>3.3) in most tested materials, particularly resin composites. Ceramic materials, such as lithium disilicate and zirconia, demonstrated greater resistance to staining. Harm-reduction products like electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products (HTPs) induced less discoloration, although effects varied by material type and surface finish. Longevity outcomes were indirectly associated with material degradation, surface roughness and plaque retention, all of which were exacerbated by smoking. Conclusion: Smoking significantly compromises the aesthetic and structural integrity of dental crowns, especially those made of resin-based materials. While newer crown materials and harm-reduction smoking alternatives may mitigate discoloration, smoking cessation remains the most effective strategy for maintaining restoration longevity and color stability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it