Genetic variation of human G6PD impacts Red Blood Cell transfusion efficacy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency, the most common human enzymopathy, affects 6% of the global population, yet its impact on blood storage and transfusion efficacy remains undefined. We integrated genome-metabolome-proteome analyses of 13,091 blood donors (362 G6PD SNPs), validated in a recalled cohort (n=643), linked donor-recipient databases, humanized mouse models (canonical, African A- [V68M+N126D], Mediterranean [S188F]), and a prospective sickle cell disease study. Common G6PD variants reduced protein abundance, reprogrammed redox metabolism, and increased storage hemolysis. In mice, G6PD-deficient RBCs showed lower post-transfusion recovery, higher oxidative stress, and impaired renal oxygenation. Clinically, recipients of G6PD-deficient units exhibited smaller hemoglobin increments and reduced RBC L¹Cr-survival (-8% at 24 h; -12% at 4 weeks). Structural studies revealed kinetic fragility for A- and thermodynamic fragility for Med-, linking genotype to protein instability and transfusion outcome. These findings identify donor G6PD genotype as a determinant of transfusion efficacy, supporting genotype-aware inventory-management strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".