MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simulating transient pore-scale behaviour of platinum degradation in PEM fuel cells using pore network modeling

2025· article· en· W4416567502 on OpenAlexafffund
Gerard Agravante, Jeff T. Gostick

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Power Sources · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlatinumProton exchange membrane fuel cellDegradation (telecommunications)ElectrolyteDissolutionCatalysisAgglomerateSolver

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Limiting the degradation of platinum catalysts in the cathode catalyst layer (CCL) of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells remains a critical challenge for commercialization. In this work, a novel transient pore-scale model of platinum degradation was developed using pore network modeling. A two-dimensional artificial image of the CCL was generated to serve as the geometric basis. The modeling technique involved coupling a performance solver that simulated the oxygen reduction reaction with a degradation solver that accounted for platinum dissolution and oxidation reactions. The results reproduce degradation trends such as spatial variations in surface area loss and transient changes in platinum oxide coverage and platinum ion concentration. Crucially, the model has the ability to uncover new microstructural insights, including how constrictions between agglomerates can lead to localized degradation and how longer transport paths correlate with reduced platinum loss. The developed model provides a foundation for optimizing and designing the CCL pore structure to mitigate degradation and enhance fuel cell durability. • A transient 2D pore network model of platinum degradation is developed. • Model provides a pore-scale view of degradation and captures spatial heterogeneities. • Structural features are shown to influence platinum degradation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Power SourcesSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207