Bibliographic record
Abstract
It was bound to happen.Thanks to Robert Kitchen and Glenn Peers, readers have the opportunity to explore the ways modern film (Stanley Kubrick) and cartoons (The Adventures of Tin Tin) illumine a fifth-century Syriac poem about a liturgically adept parrot.The Syriac poem is "The Bird Who Sang the Trisagion," about a parrot who echoes Miaphysite Christological views.The Syriac-speaking poet is Isaac of Antioch, who 'parrots' the parrot.Or, as Glenn Peers puts it, he "finds himself falling into a kind of parrot-hood himself" (p.64).The year 2024 has been surprisingly good for this Syriac-speaking poet, whose identity has long been embroiled in controversy.After all, two English translations of poems attributed to Isaac have been published in this one year alone: Adam Becker's translation of his moral homilies (SBL Press) 1 and this masterful volume by Robert Kitchen and Glenn Peers (Palgrave Macmillan).This slender work may be the first volume in the Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature to feature early Syriac poetry; this in a series that "publishes work that looks, specifically, at the implications of the 'animal turn' for the field of English Studies" (preface).As the authors point out, Isaac has been a largely understudied poet, perhaps partly because there has been significant debate over which Isaac, among several different individuals, authored the corpus attributed to him.Among several possible contenders, Kitchen identifies the author of this poem, "The Bird Who Sang the Trisagion," as an Isaac who moved to Antioch in the late fifth century and who is thought to have written 183 memre and 19 madrashe (pp.4-5).This is the Isaac who
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.300 | 0.228 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".