Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of legal mechanisms for regulating objects of intellectual property (hereinafter - OIP) created by military personnel during the performance of their official duties. In the context of modern challenges associated with the military aggression of the Russian Federation and the processes of European integration of Ukraine, the need for comprehensive legal regulation of this area as a strategic resource for strengthening the national security of the state is becoming more urgent. The authors state that domestic legislation on intellectual property and military-labor relations contains significant gaps in regulating the creation, protection and use of the results of the creative activities of military personnel, which leads to the violation of their rights and legitimate interests. The central place in the article is occupied by the study of foreign practice of regulating OIP in defense structures. The approaches of Canada, the USA and Ireland are considered, which demonstrate differentiated models of management of intellectual property of military personnel. In particular, the American mechanism of “government works” is analyzed, which excludes them from the scope of copyright, but at the same time provides for special regimes of technology transfer through CRADA and FTTA. The DFARS provisions on the transfer of copyrights to “special works” to the state are examined in detail. The Irish experience shows a model of full transfer of rights to IPR of military personnel to the Ministry of Defense, which ensures centralized management of the intellectual potential of the defense organization. Based on a comparative analysis, the authors proposed a set of measures to harmonize Ukrainian legislation with the norms of NATO partner states. Among them, the need for active application of norms on the participation of the state as an independent participant in civil legal relations, the development of a clear mechanism for the acquisition, transfer and implementation of property rights to IPR by state institutions, the determination of bodies authorized to manage these rights, is highlighted. The creation of a single state platform for accounting, monitoring and commercialization of IPR created within the civil service is proposed as a tool for transparency and effective use of the intellectual potential of civil servants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".