MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416582198 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0337241

Trends and disparities in antenatal care utilization: A multilevel analysis of four-plus and eight-plus ANC visits among urban women in Ethiopia

2025· article· en· W4416582198 on OpenAlexaff
Worku Dechassa Heyi, Wubegzier Mekonnen, Dessalegn Y. Melesse

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultilevel modelPsychological interventionMarital statusSocioeconomic statusMultilevel modellingHealth equityMaternal health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Antenatal care(ANC) is the gateway of the continuum of reproductive health care, offering a framework for complication prevention, screening, diagnosis, and health promotion. OBJECTIVE: This study examined trends, disparities and associated factors of ANC utilization (ANC4+ and ANC8+) among urban women in Ethiopia between 2000 and 2019. METHODS: We analyzed five rounds of Ethiopian Demographic and Health Surveys (2000-2019) data, disaggregated by wealth, education, and region using Stata version 16.1. Multilevel logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with four-plus and eight-plus ANC utilization. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals were reported, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: ANC4 + utilization increased from 43.1% in 2000 to 58.7% in 2019. while, ANC8 + utilization declined from 11.4% to 3.6%. Among the urban non-poor, ANC4 + rose from 60.5% to 81.8% compared to 37.8% to 48.7% among the urban poor. Regional disparities were pronounced: Addis Ababa showed the highest ANC4 + use (72% to 82%), but a decline in ANC8+ (38% to 10%). Somali region had the lowest ANC4+ (9% to 24%) utilization, though it increased from 9% in 2000 to 24% in 2019 and Gambella had the lowest ANC8 + utilization. Wealth disparities were strong, with non-poor women more likely to utilize ANC4+ (AOR= 2.43; 95% CI: 2.12-2.78) and ANC8+ (AOR= 3.02; 95% CI: 2.49-3.65) than poor women. Education also significantly associated: women with secondary or higher education had greater odds of ANC4+ (AOR= 3.02; 95% CI: 2.54-3.59) and ANC8+ (AOR= 2.13; 95% CI: 1.63-2.78). Women aged 30-34 years had higher odds of utilizing ANC4+ (AOR= 2.89; 95% CI: 2.10-3.98) and ANC8+ (AOR= 2.22; 95% CI: 1.37-3.59). Weekly media exposure was positively associated with ANC4+ (AOR= 1.53; 95% CI: 1.28-1.83). CONCLUSION: Significant disparities in ANC (ANC4+ and ANC8+) utilization persist across wealth, education and regions in urban Ethiopia. Wealth status was the strongest predictor, with non-poor women steadily advantaged. Maternal education, age, media exposure, and marital status also showed positive associations, while regional disparities persisted, with Addis Ababa outperforming other urban areas. Improving ANC uptake requires targeted interventions for urban poor women, alongside media-based awareness and educational initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONE→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→