First steps in walking, the potential beginnings of resonance? The inaugural experience of mountain walking among vocational high school students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inspired by Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception, the sociology of relations to the world, developed by Harmut Rosa (2018), explores how a connection is established with the world, with oneself, and with others. After analyzing several canonical works on walking, written by naturalists, anthropologists and philosophers, providing detailed accounts of walks, this study explores how walking in nature can represent a potential opportunity for resonance for high school students who are unfamiliar with this environment. More specifically, it seeks to identify the potential beginnings of a resonance string, the promises and early signs of vibration, likely to lead, if repeated and consolidated, to the internalisation of a singular area of resonance regarding the relationship to the body and the environment. Three main results emerge based on three types of relationships: 1. a relationship of alienation develops among high school students during this first walking experience (between repulsion and indifference towards the environment); 2. a relationship based on resistance (as a ridgeline between alienation and resonance) emerges depending on the hostility of the terrain, the nature of the effort, and the sense of self-efficacy of the practitioners; 3. a vibrant chord of resonance is revealed in some high school students during the walk as they are affected by the silence, the landscape, and the connection to others.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".