MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416592788 · doi:10.1038/s41477-025-02182-8

Author Correction: Striking convergent selection history of wheat and barley and its potential for breeding

2025· erratum· en· W4416592788 on OpenAlexaff
Mamadou Dia Sow, Cristian Forestan, Caroline Pont, Peter Civáň, Raffaella Battaglia, Michael Seidel, Cléa Siguret, Pasquale Luca Curci, Alessandro Tondelli, Daniela Bustos Korts, Elisabetta Mazzucotelli, Thibault Leroy, Cécile Huneau, Manon Delahaye, Danara Ormanbekova, Matteo Bozzoli, Perle Guarino‐Vignon, Caroline Schaal, Manon Cabanis, Marie Lelievre, Jean Cayrol, Davide Guerra, Domenica Nigro, Ágata Gadaleta, Jennifer Ens, Krystalee Wiebe, Beth Shapiro, Richard E. Green, Fred A. van Eeuwijk, Micha Bayer, Joanne Russell, Ian Dawson, Robbie Waugh, Benjamin Kilian, Ludovic Orlando, Gabriella Sonnante, Curtis Pozniak, Roberto Tuberosa, Georg Haberer, Marco Maccaferri, Luigi Cattivelli, Jérôme Salse

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Plants · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersRégion Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)Convergent evolutionNatural selectionPlant breeding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the version of the article initially published, the surname of Manon Delahaye appeared incorrectly (as Delayhe) and has now been corrected. Additionally, in Fig. 7, the labels “AGW” and “BW” were shifted to the left and have been amended. These corrections have been made to the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature PlantsSame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207