MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416600592 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-02361751mtgabs

<i>(Invited)</i> P-Bits and Application of P-Bit-Based Ising Models to Protein Folding and Molecular Docking Problems

2025· article· W4416600592 on OpenAlexaff
Gengchiau Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Biological Computing
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbabilistic logicScalabilityProtein foldingENCODEComputational complexity theoryRobustness (evolution)Ising modelComputation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The computational complexity of biological phenomena, exemplified by protein folding and molecular docking, presents significant challenges due to their inherently non-deterministic polynomial-time (NP)-complete characteristics. Recent advancements in probabilistic computing, particularly probabilistic bits (p-bits), offer promising avenues for addressing these complex biological computations through efficient implementation of Ising models. This presentation discusses two pioneering studies demonstrating the efficacy of p-bit-based probabilistic computing systems in solving the 3-dimensional (3-D) protein folding problem and molecular docking, both crucial in biomedical research and pharmaceutical discovery. In addressing the protein folding challenge, a novel p-bit-based probabilistic computational approach has been developed. This approach leverages the well-established hydrophobic-polar (HP) lattice model, extended into 3-D space, to systematically encode amino acid sequences and their spatial constraints into an Ising framework. A sophisticated encoding scheme involving many-body interactions significantly streamlines the energy landscape, reducing complexity and enhancing computational efficiency. Simulation results indicate marked improvements in identifying correct folding configurations, notably demonstrating a substantial reduction—approximately half—in the total number of energy levels for shorter peptide sequences. Furthermore, this approach successfully predicts optimal configurations for peptide sequences containing up to 36 amino acids, reinforcing the robustness and scalability of p-bit probabilistic circuits (p-circuits) in solving biologically pertinent NP-complete problems. Complementing this work, we introduce the first application of p-bit-based probabilistic computing to molecular docking, a critical process in the elucidation of ligand-target interactions essential for drug discovery. Traditional docking methodologies frequently encounter significant obstacles due to the complex combinatorial nature of ligand-receptor interactions. Here, the molecular docking problem is recast as a Maximum Weighted Clique (MWC) optimization within graph theory, permitting its translation into an Ising model that p-circuits can efficiently resolve. Application of this innovative methodology to practical cases, including docking interactions involving the LolA-LolCDE lipoprotein complex and the AF9 YEATS domain with cyclopeptide inhibitors, demonstrates superior accuracy and computational efficiency compared to established quantum-based computational approaches, such as Gaussian Boson Sampling (GBS) and Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithms (QAOA). Specifically, this p-bit-based method achieved an impressive success rate of approximately 84% in accurately predicting optimal docking conformations. Collectively, these studies underscore the transformative potential of probabilistic computing utilizing p-bits. The successful application of p-circuits to complex biological problems not only highlights their suitability and adaptability to large-scale biological computations but also establishes a foundation for future methodological innovations. By integrating probabilistic computing with biological research, this emerging computational paradigm holds substantial promise for significantly enhancing computational accuracy, efficiency, and capacity in biomedical science and pharmacological discovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicDNA and Biological ComputingFrench-language works237,207