MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416602089 · doi:10.1149/ma2025-02412029mtgabs

In-Operando EIS Monitoring of a PEM Fuel Cell Stack to Understand the Influence of Different Operating Conditions on Stack Performance

2025· article· W4416602089 on OpenAlexaff
Nigel Patterson, Julian Rosas, Mariam Awara, Benjamin Maxwell, Essam S. Elsahwi, Cynthia A. Rice, Mohammed Mahrous Abodouh, Mara Jezernik

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStack (abstract data type)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellAnodeCathodeDielectric spectroscopyOperating temperatureElectrical impedanceWork (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs) are a popular alternative to replace combustion engines, providing a clean pathway for green mobility and green energy. With their ability to deliver high power density at relatively low operating temperatures, PEMFCs are ideally suited for applications ranging from heavy-duty vehicles to grid balancing. However, optimizing their performance while extending stack lifetime requires a deep understanding of the complex electrochemical and transport phenomena that govern their operation. This study presents a comprehensive investigation of an industrial-scale PEMFC stack from Plug Power operating at high current densities—up to 1 A/cm²—across 27 different operating conditions. The operational condition design of experiments varied key parameters including current density, temperature, fuel ratio, cathode and anode humidity, and cathode and anode pressure, measuring each of the 20 cells within the stack simultaneously. The goal was to map how these variables interact and influence electrochemical behavior under realistic operating conditions. To achieve this, we employed in-operando electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)— using specialized instruments developed by Pulsenics—to continuously monitor internal electrochemical processes during fuel cell operation. Unlike conventional EIS, which is performed post-operation or at rest, in-operando EIS captures real-time impedance signatures, allowing direct observation of performance-limiting mechanisms as they occur. Time-resolved data revealed strong correlations between operating conditions and changes in cell impedance. These insights link measurable electrochemical parameters to overall stack performance, enabling the development of operational strategies to optimize efficiency and durability. This work demonstrates the value of in-operando EIS as a high-resolution tool for fuel cell diagnostics, enabling more intelligent design, operation, and management of PEMFC systems in industrial applications. By bridging the gap between lab-based measurements and real-world operation, this technique offers a powerful pathway to accelerate the commercialization and reliability of fuel cell technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207