ANALISIS PERBAIKAN PROSES BISNIS PENGELOLAAN BANTUAN LOGISTIK KEBENCANAAN PADA BADAN PENANGGULANGAN BENCANA DAERAH (BPBD) PROVINSI JAWA BARAT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan kajian pada Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (PKM) ini adalah melakukan analisis perbaikan proses bisnis pengelolaan bantuan logistik kebencanaan pada Badan Penanggulangan Bencana Daerah Provinsi Jawa Barat (BPBD Jabar). Analisis perbaikan proses bisnis dilakukan melalui tiga tahap. Tahap pertama adalah identifikasi proses bisnis saat ini dengan pendekatan Business Process Mapping. Tahap kedua adalah perbaikan proses bisnis menggunakan pendekatan Business Process Improvement. Tahap terakhir adalah penetapan peran para pihak yang menjalankan proses bisnis menggunakan pendekatan RACI Matrix. Kajian difokuskan pada proses bisnis penerimaan, penyimpanan, dan distribusi bantuan logistik kebencanaan dari BPBD Jabar ke BPBD kabupaten/ Kota di Provinsi Jawa Barat. Kajian menghasilkan peta proses bisnis baku, dan penetapan peran dan tanggung jawab yang jelas bagi para pihak yang terlibat dalam pengelolaan bantuan logistik kebencanaan. Hasil kajian selanjutnya menjadi pedoman pengembangan sistem informasi pengelolaan bantuan logistik kebencanaan pada BPBD Jabar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".