MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416607958 · doi:10.1029/2025tc009040

Crustal Architecture and Low‐Temperature Geochronology of an Apparent Cycladic Tectonic Window (NE Attica, Greece): Insights Into Imbrication in Subduction Settings

2025· article· en· W4416607958 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Bakowsky, David Schneider, Bernhard Grasemann, Renelle Dubosq, Taylor Ducharme

Bibliographic record

VenueTectonics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNappeGeochronologySubductionImbricationAllochthonTectonicsDiachronousWindow (computing)ZirconThermochronology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Understanding the timing and configuration of tectonic nappes in collapsed orogens is integral to reconstructing its geodynamic evolution. Northeastern Attica lies between bivergent Miocene detachment systems and has historically been interpreted as a tectonic window exposing the lowest nappe of the Hellenides, the Basal Unit. Our new correlative mapping instead show the region is dominated by a NE‐dipping block of Cycladic Blueschist Unit (CBU) bounded on either side by normal‐ and thrust‐sense, top‐to‐SW faults. In the west, low‐grade Pelagonian Zone overlies the CBU along the West Cycladic Detachment System (WCDS). To the east, a high‐pressure marble package correlated with the Basal Unit is emplaced above the CBU along the newly identified Marathon Thrust. White mica from sheared rocks in the WCDS footwall record earliest Miocene 40 Ar/ 39 Ar dates. In contrast, detrital mica from the WCDS hanging wall span the Permian to late Eocene, consistent with a decrease in metamorphic grade expected across the WCDS. Zircon (U‐Th)/He cooling dates are similar to southern Attica, suggesting exhumation of the Attic Peninsula to upper crustal levels by the middle Miocene. Our revised crustal architecture and recognition of the Marathon Thrust limit the extent of the Basal Unit and challenge the long‐standing tectonic window model. Instead, we propose the Basal Unit originates from the Internal Hellenides and is locally incorporated into the subduction channel through processes such as out‐of‐sequence thrusting of the CBU or subduction erosion of the upper plate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.624
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectonicsSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207