MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416608225 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.241694

A cluster randomized controlled trial of an electronic medical record–based pathway for pediatric asthma in primary care in Alberta

2025· article· en· W4416608225 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Melissa L. Potestio, Heather Sharpe, David W. Johnson, Jeremy Grimshaw, Peter Faris, Qiuli Duan, Jody Pow, Andrew Cave

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaOttawa HospitalAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary careRandomized controlled trialCluster (spacecraft)AsthmaCluster randomised controlled trialMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians, who manage the care of most children with asthma, often do not optimally assess disease control, prescribe asthma controller medications, or provide family asthma education. We developed a pediatric asthma clinical pathway embedded in an electronic medical record (EMR) for use by primary care practices, and we sought to evaluate its effects on prescription and use of asthma controller medication for children with asthma. METHODS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial, enrolling primary care practices in Alberta that used Wolf or Med Access EMRs, and managed at least 50 children with asthma. The multifaceted intervention included an EMR-based pathway for pediatric asthma, Web-based education modules for physicians, and train-the-trainer sessions for practice staff to provide patient education. The control intervention was standard care. We extracted study data from participating practices' EMRs, and standard emergency department and hospital administrative data sets. The primary and main secondary outcomes were improvement in the proportion of children prescribed and dispensed controller medications, respectively. RESULTS: Eleven practices were randomly assigned to each of the intervention and control groups. The intervention did not significantly change the proportion of children prescribed (mean difference 4.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.0% to 10.5%) or dispensed (mean difference -0.1%, 95% CI -7.1% to 6.9%) controller medications. INTERPRETATION: Our multifaceted intervention did not improve the proportion of children in primary care who were prescribed or dispensed a controller medication for asthma. These results suggest that such interventions may require active alerts and targeting of walk-in and urgent care clinics to have a meaningful impact on clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02481037.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.877
Threshold uncertainty score0.244

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicElectronic Health Records Systems→French-language works237,207→