Conserved Functions of <scp>LARP1</scp> Proteins in Eukaryotes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT La and La‐related proteins (LARPs) are conserved RNA‐binding proteins that share a characteristic La motif (LaM) and have important functions in RNA metabolism. Members of the LARP1 family bind a cohort of mRNAs encoding factors involved in the process of mRNA translation, including ribosomal protein mRNAs (RP mRNAs). These mRNAs can contain a sequence of 5–15 pyrimidines in their 5′UTRs, immediately following the m 7 G cap, and are named 5′ terminal oligopyrimidine (5′TOP) mRNAs. The DM15 domain of human LARP1 has been suggested to specifically recognize this motif, thereby affecting 5′TOP mRNA translation and stability. However, the specific function of LARP1 in this context remains unclear. Intriguingly, the 5′TOP motif is not found in RP mRNAs in C. elegans and yeast, while LARP1 orthologs in some systems lack the characteristic DM15 domain, suggesting that essential functions of LARP1 family members may precede the emergence of the 5′TOP motif and the DM15. In this work, we review studies in humans and several model organisms where we draw parallels between reported RNA binding modes and functions of different LARP1 orthologs. We further present common themes and areas for further investigation. This article is categorized under: RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein‐RNA Interactions: Functional Implications RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > RNA‐Protein Complexes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".