MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416612090 · doi:10.1016/j.sopen.2025.11.002

The efficacy of adipose-derived stem cell therapy for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease patients: A systematic review

2025· article· en· W4416612090 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammed Aldakhil, Raghad Ibrahim Albarrak, Jana Abdullah Alomar, Leena Ibrahim Alnasr, Rima Mohammed Alassaf, Nouf khaled Alhumaid

Bibliographic record

VenueSurgery Open Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStem cellDiseaseStem-cell therapyClinical trialCell therapyMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that often leads to the development of complex perianal fistulas, significantly impairing patients' quality of life. Conventional medical and surgical treatments offer limited long-term efficacy, with high recurrence rates and associated complications. Adipose-derived stem cell therapy (ADSCT) has emerged as a promising regenerative therapy due to its anti-inflammatory and tissue-regenerative properties. However, discrepancies in clinical outcomes across studies warrant a systematic evaluation of its efficacy and safety. Objective: This systematic review aims to critically assess the efficacy, safety, and recurrence rates of ADSCT for complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease patients, summarizing data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Methods: This review included 19 studies published between 2009 and 2024 involving Crohn's disease patients treated with either autologous or allogeneic ADSCT. Extracted data included patient demographics, fistula characteristics, treatment protocols, and clinical outcomes such as fistula closure, partial healing, time to healing, recurrence, and adverse events. Study selection followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and is illustrated in a PRISMA flow diagram. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials and adapted versions of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and MINORS criteria for observational studies. Studies were categorized as excellent, good, or fair based on their total quality score. Results: Fistula closure rates ranged from 23.1 % to 91 %, with an overall average of 62.5 %. Partial healing rates varied widely, between 9 % and 93.3 %. Time to healing ranged from 8 to 48 weeks, with an average of 25.3 weeks. Recurrence rates were reported in over half of the studies and reached up to 38.5 %, with a mean recurrence rate of 19.2 %. The majority of adverse events were mild and transient, including local inflammation, discomfort, and minor infections. No serious (Grade 3 or 4) complications were reported. Risk of bias assessment classified one study as excellent, two as good, and two as fair in methodological quality. Conclusion: Adipose-derived stem cell therapy demonstrates promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile for the treatment of complex perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease. While ADSCT may achieve meaningful clinical response and symptom relief in a substantial proportion of patients, variability in outcomes and study designs highlights the need for standardized protocols and long-term follow-up in future trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.012
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSurgery Open ScienceSame topicAnorectal Disease Treatments and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207