MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Incidence of toxic anterior segment syndrome and endophthalmitis in 190 000 eyes in a high-volume, multisurgeon, national network of ambulatory surgical centers using uniform perioperative protocols

2025· article· en· W4416612166 on OpenAlexaff
Avi Wallerstein, Vikram Lekhi, Iqbal Ike K. Ahmed, Mona Harissi‐Dagher, Darren Albert, John B. Lloyd, Louis Racine, Pierre Trottier, Mark E. Cohen, Mathieu Gauvin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsPrism Eye InstituteUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalUniversity of CalgaryMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndophthalmitisPerioperativeIncidence (geometry)VitrectomyAmbulatoryPhacoemulsification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plain Language Summary Toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) and postoperative endophthalmitis are rare but serious complications of intraocular surgery. Real-world incidence data from high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) remain limited. We retrospectively analyzed 190,005 consecutive eyes undergoing cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange between January 2022 and April 2025 across 54 ASC sites. All cases were performed by 172 surgeons using standardized perioperative and sterilization protocols. Suspected TASS and endophthalmitis events were independently validated and centrally reviewed. Ten TASS cases were identified (0.0053%; 95% CI, 0.0029–0.0097%), including one bilateral case, all resolving with topical corticosteroids. Three endophthalmitis cases occurred (0.0016%; 95% CI, 0.0005–0.0046%), each managed successfully with intravitreal antibiotics and vitrectomy as indicated. No clustering was observed. The incidence of TASS and endophthalmitis in this national ASC network was markedly lower than reported in hospital-based studies. These findings support the safety of standardized high-volume ASC environments, including immediate sequential bilateral surgery. Plain Language SummaryThis study looked at the occurrence of two rare complications, TASS and endophthalmitis, after eye surgeries in high-volume ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). Researchers analyzed data from 190,005 surgeries performed by 172 surgeons across 54 ASCs. They found 10 cases of TASS (0.0053%) and 3 cases of endophthalmitis (0.0016%), all successfully treated. The rates were lower than those reported in hospital settings, suggesting that standardized procedures in ASCs are safe and effective. This supports the use of ASCs for high-volume surgeries, including immediate sequential bilateral operations, due to their low complication rates. Text is machine generated and may contain inaccuracies. FAQ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cataract & Refractive SurgerySame topicOcular Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207