MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416639880 · doi:10.2196/87227

Differentiating Ischemic From Nonischemic T-Wave Inversion Using a Multimodal Vision-Language Model With Reinforcement Learning (ECG-R1): Development and Validation Study

2025· article· en· W4416639880 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yunzhang Cheng, Zhongkai Wang, Wen Zhang, Qin Zhang, Mingwei Zhang, Tianyi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicECG Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReinforcement learningGeneralizationMedical diagnosisClinical PracticeDiagnostic accuracyInversion (geology)Waveform

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> The differentiation of ischemic from non-ischemic T-wave inversion (TWI) on electrocardiograms (ECGs) is a critical diagnostic challenge in cardiology. The non-specific nature of TWI leads to high false-positive rates, resulting in unnecessary, costly, and risky invasive procedures for patients. Existing deep learning models are often limited by being single-modality "black boxes". </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> The objective of this study is to develop a novel diagnostic framework designed to address the critical clinical challenge of accurately differentiating ischemic from non-ischemic TWI. By utilizing a multi-modal Vision-Language Model trained with a Reinforcement Learning (RL) paradigm, this study aims to improve diagnostic accuracy and provide interpretable reasoning. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> We develop ECG-R1, a multi-modal framework using the Qwen2-VL-2B Vision-Language Model to analyze both ECG waveform images and associated clinical text. Instead of SFT, the model is trained using a RL paradigm with the Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) algorithm. The model is trained to generate a structured output containing an explicit reasoning trace and a final "Yes" or "No" answer. A two-component, rule-based reward function is designed to assess both format adherence and diagnostic accuracy. Performance is compared against strong Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) baselines. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> On a multi-modal dataset of 12,917 cases with TWI, our GRPO model achieves an average accuracy of 74.07%, demonstrating strong generalization with 72.93% accuracy in cross-hospital validation. This result is an improvement of ~24 % over the ~50% diagnostic accuracy of clinicians and 8.2% higher than the best SFT baseline, using ~71% fewer parameters. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> The RL-based ECG-R1 framework successfully differentiates ischemic from non-ischemic TWI and demonstrates significantly better generalization than standard SFT methods. By enhancing diagnostic accuracy and providing interpretable reasoning, this approach offers a more robust and trustworthy tool to support clinical decision-making in cardiology. </sec>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicECG Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207