FAUST
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measuring the properties of disks around Class 0/I protostars is crucial for understanding protostellar assembly and early planet formation. We present high-resolution (~7.5 au) ALMA continuum observations at 1.3 and 3 mm of 16 disks around Class 0/I protostars across multiple star-forming regions (Taurus, Ophiuchus, and Corona Australis) and a variety of multiplicities. Our observations show a wide range of deconvolved disk sizes (~2–100 au) and the presence of circumbinary disks (CBDs) in all binaries with separations <100 au. The measured properties show similarities to Class II disks, including (a) low spectral index values ( α disks = 2.1 −0.3 +0.5 ) that increase with disk radius, (b) 3 mm disk sizes only marginally smaller than at 1.3 mm (<10%), and (c) radial intensity morphologies well described by modified self-similar profiles. However, there are some key differences: (i) the α 1.3-3 mm values increase monotonically with radius but exceed two only at the disk edge; (ii) higher brightness temperatures, T b , comparable to or higher than the predicted midplane temperatures due to irradiation; and (iii) an approximately ten times higher luminosity at a given size compared to the Class II disks. Together, the results confirm significant optical depth in the observed Class 0/I disks, most with T bol < 200 K, at both 1.3 and 3 mm. Assuming fully optically thick disks at these wavelengths can explain the higher luminosities compared with Class II disks, but the most compact (≲40 au) disks also require higher temperatures, suggesting additional heating from viscous accretion. Taking into account the high optical depths, most disk dust masses are estimated in the range 30–900 M ⊕ (or 0.01–0.3 M ⊙ in gas), with some disks potentially reaching marginal gravitational instability. Based on the elevated T b 1.3 mm , the median location of the water iceline is ~3 au, but this location can extend to more than 10–20 au for the hottest disks in the sample. The CBDs exhibit lower optical depths at both wavelengths and hence higher spectral index values ( τ 3 mm ≲ 1, α CBD = 3.0 −0.3 +0.2 ), dust masses of ~10 2 M ⊕ , and dust emissivity indices of β CBD ~ 1.5 (two Class 0 CBDs) and ~1 (one Class I CBD), suggesting substantial grain growth only in the more evolved CBD. The high optical depths inferred from our analysis provide a compelling explanation for the apparent scarcity of dust substructures in the younger Class 0/I disks at ~1 mm despite the mounting evidence of early planet formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.620 | 0.584 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".