Evolving Themes in Marriage and Family Counseling: A Content Analysis of <i>The Family Journal</i> 2006–2023
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present content analysis of all print articles published from January 2006 (Volume 14) through October 2023 (Volume 31) in The Family Journal revealed some themes and trends in the 18 years since the last review of the first 13 years of the journal. The content analysis reflected editorial priorities and reported publishing trends. In addition, the changes in journal content over time identified some meaningful themes in marriage and family counseling. A pilot content analysis for 2023 (Volume 31, Issues 1–4) refined the types and subtypes of published articles as well as categories, subcategories, and domains. Evolving themes in the content of The Family Journal informed editorial policy and facilitated review of the journal's mission. Identified themes and trends in marriage and family counseling could be helpful in understanding overall changes in the profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it