Identification of novel pathogenic variants in the <i>PHYH</i> gene and extending the phenotypic range in Refsum disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose Two patients with a suspected inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) were referred to a specialist ophthalmology clinic for genetic testing to determine the cause of their disease.Case Report A 50-year-old female patient (P1) presented with retinitis pigmentosa and poor vision since childhood. Molecular genetic testing in P1 revealed two novel pathogenic variants in PHYH (NM_006214.4): p.(Val93*) and p.(Asn71Ilefs*23). A 57-year-old male patient (P2) presented with pigmentary changes at the macula. Molecular genetic testing in P2 revealed two novel variants in PHYN: p.(Phe183Ser) and c.2461G>C (splice acceptor). Both patients were referred to the metabolic disease clinic and phytanic acid levels were found to be 256 µg/mL in P1 (normal is < 3 µg/mL) and 48.2 µmol/L in P2 (normal is < 2.2 µmol/L) confirming the diagnosis of Refsum disease. Both patients shared systemic features of the disease including bilaterally abnormal metatarsals and dry skin, while P1 also had characteristic anosmia, kidney disease, peripheral neuropathy and mild hearing impairment.Conclusion We document for the first time an association between macular dystrophy and Refsum disease. Early diagnosis is important so that diet can be modified to improve prognosis for the complications associated with Refsum disease, although improvements in vision, slowing the retinal degeneration and overcoming refractory miosis, are less achievable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".