MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416664647 · doi:10.33823/jfs.2025.7.1.295

Joyful Defiance in Performance

2025· article· en· W4416664647 on OpenAlexaff
Rosanne Sia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Festive Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlCONTESTWhite (mutation)Ethnic groupSymbol (formal)PoliticsMexican americansCollective memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues that the figure of the joyful girl in fiesta served as an important site of contest over race, place, and memory in South Texas during the 1950s. The joyful girl has played a significant, if overlooked, role in fiesta traditions in South Texas: as a cultural symbol onto whom joy has been projected and as a historical actor who has experienced and shared joy with her community by participating in fiesta. This article first examines girlhood in the Texas Citrus Fiesta in Mission, Texas, an Anglo-run festival founded by citrus industry leaders that functioned as a formal place-marketing pageant. The fiesta’s promotional images often featured joyful Anglo American girls who served as symbols of white reproductive futurity in the region. Mexican American girls seldom appeared, but when they did, they appeared as figures in a timeless romanticized past that minimized the role of Mexican American girls in contemporary politics. Second, this article turns to the informal fiestas crafted by a Mexican American girl in her daily life growing up in Mission during the 1950s. Drawing on oral history, it shows how she actively used joyful song to affirm her ethnic Mexican cultural heritage while also drawing together communities across a racial divide. She challenged the racial politics asserted by the Texas Citrus Fiesta, her hometown’s official fiesta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Festive StudiesSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207