MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416674041 · doi:10.1186/s12870-025-07757-3

Genome-wide analysis of soybean MLPs reveals evolutionary and structural insights into drought, salt stress and ABA responses

2025· article· en· W4416674041 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaocen Ma, Qing Yu, Qi Wang, Yixuan Li, Heng Liu, Siyu Chen, Wei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Plant Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong Province
KeywordsAbscisic acidGeneAbiotic stressPhylogenetic treeGene familyGene expression profilingStructural similarityPhylogeneticsGene cluster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The major latex protein (MLP) gene family, which is part of the Bet v 1 superfamily, is known for its roles in plant development and stress responses. However, the MLP gene family in soybean (Glycine max) remains insufficiently characterized. In this study, we systematically identified 17 MLP genes (GmMLPs) containing the conserved Bet v 1 domain within the soybean genome. These genes were classified into three subgroups—Type I, Type II, and Type III—based on sequence similarity and phylogenetic analysis. Chromosomal mapping revealed an uneven distribution of GmMLPs across the 20 soybean chromosomes, with a tendency to cluster in the lower arm regions, indicating nonrandom chromosomal localization. Gene structure analysis revealed that most GmMLPs contain a single intron, whereas a few, such as GmMLP3 and GmMLP4, possess multiple introns, reflecting structural diversity within the gene family. Expression profiling using qRT‒PCR demonstrated that several GmMLPs are responsive to abscisic acid (ABA), drought, and salt stress, suggesting potential roles in abiotic stress responses. These findings provide a comprehensive foundation for future functional studies of the role of GmMLPs in stress tolerance and adaptation in soybean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Plant BiologySame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207