MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416674347 · doi:10.1242/jeb.250982

Cadences of the collective: conspecific stimulation patterns interact with endogenous rhythms to cue socially mediated response shifts

2025· article· en· W4416674347 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Luke C. Larter, Colby W. Cushing, Michael J. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCollege of Natural Sciences, University of Texas at AustinSmithsonian InstitutionGraduate School, University of Texas, AustinSmithsonian Tropical Research InstituteUniversity of Texas at AustinBrown UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsStimulus (psychology)RhythmStimulationSocial relationSocial animalSensory systemPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many animals form behavioral collectives, and optimal interaction strategies often differ across social contexts. Sensory scenes generated by many interacting conspecifics are complex. Thus, maintaining socially calibrated responses requires individuals to distill key features from conspecific scenes to guide continued adjustments to social fluctuations. Túngara frogs produce mating calls in choruses varying in size, and interaction patterns differ across social environments; rivals alternate their calls in smaller choruses, but increasingly overlap one another's calls in a stereotyped fashion as chorus size increases. We used automated playback to investigate the cues guiding this socially mediated shift in interaction modes. We played conspecific stimulus calls to males at various delays relative to their own calls, preceded by various acoustic motifs that mimicked conspecific stimulation patterns males will hear in different social environments. Males almost never overlapped isolated stimulus calls at any delays. However, their probabilities of overlapping stimulus calls increased markedly when stimulus calls were preceded by motifs characteristic of larger choruses, i.e. those exhibiting intense conspecific stimulation patterns. Furthermore, the escalatory effects of motifs became increasingly pronounced as motif/stimulus combinations were played at later delays. Thus, interaction strategies are calibrated to current social dynamics each call cycle in response to a multifaceted cue that incorporates both the nature of conspecific stimulation experienced and how the timing of this stimulation interacts with endogenous responsiveness rhythms. Our results highlight that inactive phases within behavioral rhythms provide repeated opportunities to sample current social dynamics, allowing response patterns to be continually calibrated to social fluctuations in behavioral collectives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental Biology→Same topicAmphibian and Reptile Biology→French-language works237,207→