MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416675420 · doi:10.1186/s13741-025-00628-3

Day-of-surgery quality gaps in glycemic management: a retrospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4416675420 on OpenAlex
Shannon M. Ruzycki, Tyrone G. Harrison, Kirstie Lithgow, A. T. Cameron, Leta Philp, Lambert Heatlie, Rosmin Esmail, Maede Ejaredar, Karmon Helmle, Julie McKeen, Derek Dillane

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerioperative Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of AlbertaAlberta HealthUniversity of Calgary
FundersAlberta Innovates
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyGlycemicDiabetes mellitusQuality (philosophy)Cohort studyCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Perioperative hyperglycemia is associated with worse patient outcomes. Characterizing quality gaps in day-of-surgery glucose management can guide quality improvement teams to address this risk factor for infection, readmission, and death. This retrospective cohort study used administrative and electronic health record data to describe process, outcome, and balancing measures of day-of-surgery glycemic management for adult patients with and without diabetes undergoing surgery at 6 hospitals in Alberta, Canada between 2019 and 2024. Participants were stratified by diabetes, prediabetes, no diabetes and unknown diabetes status. We report the association between hyperglycemia (blood glucose ≥ 10.0 mmol.L −1 ) and length of stay, admission to ICU, and 30-day readmissions as an exploratory analysis. There were 12,275 eligible procedures including 3,164 procedures performed on patients with diabetes (25.8%). Of patients with diabetes, 85.4% ( n = 2,703) had at least one glucose measurement on the day of surgery and 37.1% ( n = 1,004) had hyperglycemia. About half of patients with diabetes and hyperglycemia received insulin (51.4%, n = 516). More than 10% of patients with prediabetes, no diabetes, and unknown diabetes status had hyperglycemia and less than 20% received insulin. Patients with hyperglycemia on the day of surgery had longer length of stay (4.49 days; 95% CI 4.70 to 5.18 days; p < 0.0001), postoperative ICU admission (aOR 5.37; 95% CI 4.45–6.49; p < 0.001) and odds of 30-day readmission (aOR 2.19; 95% CI 1.89–2.54; p < 0.0001). There were important quality gaps in glucose measurement and hyperglycemia treatment for patients with diabetes. Hyperglycemia was common and clinically significant among patients without diabetes. Future work to understand the prevalence of hyperglycemia in patients without diabetes and to address quality gaps in day-of-surgery glucose measurement are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it