MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416675884 · doi:10.1130/b38511.1

Magnetite-apatite deposits of the New Jersey Highlands, USA: Geochronological evidence for orogen-scale Fe-P-(Ti) mineralization during the Grenvillian Orogeny

2025· article· en· W4416675884 on OpenAlexaffabout
Alyssa McKanna, Isabel Koran, Blair Schoene, Victor Guevara, John M. Hanchar, Richard A. Volkert, James Maeder, Cameron Mueller-Harder

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America Bulletin · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconGeochronologyOrogenyPegmatiteMineralization (soil science)Radiogenic nuclideMagmatismProterozoicLithology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnetite-apatite (MtAp) ore deposits are broadly distributed within Mesoproterozoic rocks of the New Jersey Highlands (USA); however, the age and origins of the ores, and relationships to other Fe-P-(Ti) ore deposits in the Grenvillian Orogen are presently unknown. We use zircon U-Pb geochronology and isotope geochemistry to (1) constrain the timing of MtAp mineralization in the New Jersey Highlands, (2) evaluate the relationship between the MtAp ores and associated lithologies, (3) develop a magmatic model for ore genesis, and (4) place the New Jersey ores within the context of Grenville tectonics and regional mineralization. Ore-body zircon crystals exhibit complex, magmatic textures that record episodic or prolonged crystallization over an extended duration from ca. 1074 Ma to 905 Ma, suggesting that MtAp mineralization occurred during Ottawan to post-Ottawan orogenesis. Cumulate textures of MtAp ores and a close spatial and temporal association among ores, pegmatitic granitoids (ca. 1058 Ma to ca. 986 Ma regionally), and clinopyroxene syenites (most dates ca. 1097 Ma to ca. 926 Ma at one mine) suggest that MtAp mineralization and intrusive magmatism reflect co-magmatic processes. Zircon O isotope data indicate that the MtAp deposits and associated lithologies formed from crustal melts (δ18O = 7.66‰–9.24‰ for the orthogneiss-hosted deposits and δ18O = 5.40‰–6.29‰ for the amphibolite-hosted deposit). Zircon Hf isotope data are more complex. Some MtAp deposits and associated lithologies record Hf signatures consistent with a crustal melt source (εHfi = 0.6–11.1). Whereas other MtAp deposits have extremely radiogenic signatures (εHfi = 29–542) due to the high modal abundance of apatite and monazite in the ores and, consequently, high Lu/Hf ratios. MtAp mineralization in the New Jersey Highlands is broadly coeval with MtAp mineralization in the Adirondack Highlands of New York (USA), rare earth element (REE) mineralization in the Hudson Highlands of New York, and nelsonite mineralization at Lac à l’Orignal and Lac Mirepoix in Québec (Canada). Collectively, these results indicate that orogen-scale, Fe-P-(Ti) and REE mineralization processes operated during Ottawan to post-Ottawan orogenesis throughout the Grenville orogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America BulletinSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207