MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416683531 · doi:10.1186/s12978-025-02210-y

Predictive factors associated with sexual activity and consistent condom use during travel abroad: a cross-sectional survey of young Canadian adults

2025· article· en· W4416683531 on OpenAlexaffabout
Emmanuelle Gareau, Karen P. Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueReproductive Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTravel-related health issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondomPublic healthReproductive healthSexual behaviorPsychological interventionReproductive medicineSexual orientationSexual attractionPromotion (chess)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For young adults seeking new experiences, international travel provides opportunities for casual sexual encounters. The aim of this study was to identify the predictive factors associated with travel-associated sex and consistent condom use in a non-random sample of single and partnered young travelers. Sexually-active Canadians, aged 18–25 years, who traveled abroad in 2016, were purposively recruited to participate in an online survey. Two binomial logistic regressions were performed to examine the demographic, sexual health and lifestyle factors associated with (1) having sex abroad (N = 646), or (2) consistent external condom use abroad (n = 271 sexually-active travelers). Packing condoms for international travel was associated with more than twice the odds of both having sex abroad (AOR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.47–4.51 p < 0.001) and using condoms consistently during intercourse (AOR: 2.62, 95% CI: 1.62–5.32, p = 0.008). Sex under the influence of alcohol at-home, history of sexually transmitted infections, travel-related plans to have sex and drug consumption were also associated with sex abroad. Consistent external condom use abroad was associated with prior condom use at-home and penetrative sexual practices abroad. Unlike previous studies, gender, sexual orientation and relationship status were not significantly associated with either travel-associated sex nor condom use. Travelers’ characteristics and domestic sexual behaviors will inform travel health interventions, but our findings support universal promotion of barrier protection during travel regardless of relationship status, sexual orientation or gender identity. Given the increasingly open and fluid nature of sexual expressions and relationships, pre-travel sexual health interventions should be sex-positive, broadly inclusive and promote strategies for safe sexual behaviors while travelling. The experience of international travel is often accompanied by risky behaviors including substance use and casual sex. Packing condoms for international travel was associated with a higher likelihood of travel-related sexual activity and consistent condom use. Behaviors at home including sex under the influence of alcohol, and history of sexually transmitted infections, were also linked with travel-related sex, whereas domestic condom use was associated with consistent condom use abroad. These factors can be incorporated in sex-positive, travel-sexual health promotion to ensure safe and responsible sexual activity abroad.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproductive HealthSame topicTravel-related health issuesFrench-language works237,207