MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416705609 · doi:10.1055/s-0043-1777159

Givinostat in DMD: Results of the EPIDYS Study with Particular Attention to NSAA

2023· article· en· W4416705609 on OpenAlexaff
E. Mercuri, Claudia Brogna, Jean K. Mah, N. Goemans, E. Niks, Wolfgang Müller‐Felber, Astrid Blaschek, U. Schmidt, Jessika Johannsen, Simone Cazzaniga, P. Bettica, C. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthMEDLINEQuality of Life ResearchUrban park

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Givinostat is a novel orally active histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor being developed for the treatment of DMD. Methods: EPIDYS study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Givinostat in ambulant patients with DMD. A total of 179 boys aged ≥6 years at baseline affected by DMD were enrolled and 95% of them completed the study. Primary efficacy assessment was the time to climb 4 standard stairs (4SC). Six key secondary efficacy endpoints were included: physical function assessed by North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA), time to rise from floor, distance walked in 6 minutes using 6-minute walk test, knee extension and elbow flexion quantitative muscle strength, and fat fraction of vastus lateralis muscle (VL MFF) evaluated by MR spectroscopy. Treatment duration was 18 months. Results: EPIDYS study met its primary endpoint and Givinostat demonstrated a statistically significant difference in change from baseline at 18 months in 4SC (GLS mean ratio [SD] = 0.86 [0.071]; p = 0.0345). Overall, treatment effect estimates relating to the key secondary endpoints consistently favored Givinostat over placebo supporting the primary endpoint result. NSAA was evaluated both as change from baseline at 18 months of the total score and as the cumulative loss of NSAA items. Givinostat treatment was associated with less decline in NSAA total score (mean difference: 1.91 points; nominal p = 0.021) as well as 39% less cumulative item loss (nominal p = 0.02). Givinostat treatment showed a good tolerability profile with primary issues being reversible and related to thrombocytopenia, and hypertriglyceridemia. Conclusion: EPIDYS study met its primary endpoint with consistent results in the key secondary endpoints. The treatment effects on physical function are considered clinically important and are related to how boys with DMD function in clinically meaningful motor tasks. Givinostat tolerability profile in study 48 was in line with results in previous studies in DMD and in other diseases. Publication History Article published online: 13 November 2023 © 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207