MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416706817 · doi:10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102349

Vascular Health and Early Atherosclerosis in Childhood Cancer Survivors: Reassuring Findings From Comprehensive Noninvasive Assessment

2025· article· en· W4416706817 on OpenAlexafffund
Emmanuelle Fournier, Raphael Joye, Alice Pozza, Wei Hui, Mark K. Friedberg, Emily Lam, Kyle Runeckles, Marisa Signorile, B. McCrindle, Luc Mertens, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJACC Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoSickKids Foundation
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSubclinical infectionChildhood cancerVascular diseasePopulationATHEROSCLEROTIC VASCULAR DISEASECancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is a major cause of late mortality among childhood cancer survivors (CCS), but the prevalence of early vascular changes remains poorly defined. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to evaluate early vascular dysfunction using comprehensive assessment in CCS compared with matched healthy controls. METHODS: CCS treated with anthracyclines enrolled in the Preventing Cardiac Sequelae in Pediatric Cancer Survivors study were included. Vascular assessment included carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), carotid stiffness index, carotid distensibility, flow-mediated dilation, endothelial peripheral arterial tone test, and echocardiography. CCS were categorized as early (<10 years postdiagnosis) or late (≥10 years). RESULTS: We included 206 CCS (mean age ± SD, 17.4 ± 8.1 years; mean time since diagnosis 12.2 ± 7.7 years) and 150 healthy age-, sex-, body surface area-, and blood pressure-matched controls (19.1 ± 9.7 years). Vascular parameters were not significantly different between CCS and controls, including cfPWV (5.5 ± 0.9 m/s vs 5.6 ± 0.9 m/s, P = 0.940), cIMT (0.046 ± 0.01 cm vs 0.045 ± 0.01 cm, P = 0.790), and carotid distensibility (0.40 ± 0.13 mm/mm Hg vs 0.39 ± 0.14 mm/mm Hg, P = 0.950). Among CCS, male gender was negatively associated with carotid distensibility and flow-mediated dilation, and positively with cfPWV. Late CCS showed higher cfPWV (P < 0.001), higher cIMT (P = 0.035), and lower carotid distensibility (P < 0.001) compared to early CCS; however, these differences did not remain significant compared with matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular markers of early atherosclerosis did not significantly differ between CCS and controls. Late CCS demonstrated mild vascular alteration compared with early CCS, although not compared with the healthy population. Whether these represent subclinical precursors of atherosclerosis needs further study. Routine vascular surveillance in this population is not clearly warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJACC AdvancesSame topicChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationFrench-language works237,207