MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416706962 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3637283

PEP-Policer: Eliminating the On-Off Traffic Pattern in PEP Over Satellite Networks

2025· article· W4416706962 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Chen, Lin Wang, Yue Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGoodputGeostationary orbitLimitingSatelliteNetwork congestionCommunications satellite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Performance Enhancement Proxies (PEPs) are widely used to improve TCP performance in geostationary orbit (GEO) satellite networks, which experience long RTT (approximately 500 ms). As a split TCP-based solution, PEP divides the end-to-end connection into multiple sub-connections, each independently managing its own rate control, including both congestion and flow control. This independence naturally leads to rate imbalances, manifested as an abnormal on-off traffic pattern-a phenomenon confirmed by our experimental observations in real-world GEO satellite networks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that this on-off traffic pattern not only undermines fairness but also reduces throughput, particularly for small-sized flows. To address this problem, we propose PEP-Policer, an automatic rate limiter for PEP to limit the link with higher rate to the lower one. Unlike traditional rate limiting methods that require manual configuration of the target rate, PEP-Policer employs a finite state machine to automatically determine and enforce the appropriate target rate. Moreover, as an add-on, PEP-Policer is compatible with all PEP-based solutions and can be integrated without modifying existing systems. Extensive evaluations in an emulated GEO satellite network show that PEP-Policer improves TCP's fairness and increases goodput by up to 63.0% for Cubic, 49.6% for BBR, and 88.6% for Hybla.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207