MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416711410 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.25.690604

A Globally Representative Immunopeptidomics Approach to Identify Population-Wide Vaccine Candidates

2025· preprint· W4416711410 on OpenAlexaff
Teesha C. Baker, Charley Cai, S.-H. Gu, Leonard J. Foster

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman leukocyte antigenProteomeMajor histocompatibility complexEpitopeAntigenPopulationReverse vaccinologyMHC class I

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Vaccine development has historically relied on preclinical testing using one or two cell lines, typically of Caucasian descent, contributing to vaccines that may fail to provide adequate protection across genetically diverse populations. A major factor in these failures is the lack of consideration for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) diversity, with over 30,000 HLA alleles worldwide exhibiting distinct frequencies across ethnic groups and geographic regions. Here, we present a globally representative immunopeptidomics approach that addresses HLA diversity at the earliest stages of vaccine antigen discovery. We established a panel of 30 cell lines from the 1000 Genomes Project that represent 75% of the world’s most common HLA alleles. Using a combined computational and experimental approach, we identified 18 common binding motifs (7 MHC class I and 11 MHC class II) shared across 24 cell lines from the panel. We developed an accessible bioinformatic tool that predicts globally presentable antigenic regions from any pathogen proteome by identifying peptides matching these common binding motifs. Validation with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein demonstrated that our method successfully identifies known immunogenic regions, with experimentally detected epitopes showing substantial overlap with predicted regions of interest. Notably, only three cell lines were required to validate highly immunogenic S. enterica targets, including OmpC—a porin with known 100% protective efficacy—detected across all tested lines. Our approach enables researchers to rapidly screen pathogen proteomes using freely available bioinformatic tools, with optional experimental validation requiring minimal resources. By identifying antigens with broad population coverage before clinical trials begin, this method has the potential to increase vaccine success rates while ensuring equitable protection across diverse populations. The cell line panel, common binding motifs, and bioinformatic workflow are publicly available, providing an accessible pathway for developing vaccines that truly serve global populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesFrench-language works237,207