La gestación por sustitución en España, en la legislación internacional y los derechos de las partes intervinientes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surrogacy has been studied on multiple occasions, leading to the nullity of such contracts in the LTRHA (Spanish Constitutional Court). We propose this study because controversies continue to exist on this matter, as this practice continues to be carried out in various countries where it is authorized. Therefore, we analyze Supreme Court Ruling 1626/2024, of December 4. It argues that the execution of a surrogacy contract violates the dignity and free development of personality of both the surrogate mother and the children born, because it considers that they are treated as mere objects. Furthermore, the actions of intended parents are penalized because their claim that the contract, validated by a foreign judgment, determines the parentchild relationship continues to violate the dignity and free development of the surrogate mother and the child. This study analyzes the rights of the parties involved, the best interests of the child, the exequatur procedure, and the registration of children born as a result of surrogacy in the Spanish Civil Registry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.062 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it