MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416723992 · doi:10.9734/ajgr/2025/v8i4343

Global Research Landscape and Knowledge Evolution of Early Warning Systems in Natural Disaster Management

2025· article· W4416723992 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T Adarsh, Neenu S Pillai, Suresh Selvaraj, M Balu

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Journal of Geographical Research · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSeismology and Earthquake Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarning systemDisaster risk reductionNatural hazardNatural disasterEmergency managementEarly warning systemCompendiumMultidisciplinary approachCitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The comprehensive approach to bibliometric analysis examines global research on Early Warning Systems (EWS) in relation to disaster management from 2001 to 2024, with data retrieved from the Web of Science and Scopus databases. The Bibliometrix R package is the tool that is used to examine publication trends, influential sources, country-level contributions, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution to map the intellectual and structural development of the field. It helps to reveal a steady and exponential growth in publications, particularly after 2015, coinciding with the adoption of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015–2030). China takes the lead in research productivity with the largest share of publications followed by Italy, the United States, Australia, and Canada that have higher citation impact and international visibility. Natural Hazards, Landslides, and the International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction are identified as the top research outlets and the developing conceptual basis in the field is comprised of keywords associated with “early warning system,” “disaster management,” “floods,” “risk assessment,” and, “climate change." The thematic and factorial analyses depicted early warning systems, climate change, and disaster management as well-developed motor themes, while emerging themes in the research literature included machine learning, resilience, and Internet of Things (IoT) based warning models. Additionally, the international collaboration network suggests a dual-core pattern with China leading in South-South partnerships, and Europe anchoring research networks in the West. The authors highlight that EWS research has developed as a multidisciplinary and globally located compendium of early warning system science, that connects technology innovation, environmental science with policy-developed frameworks, to improve resilience to disasters. Findings from this study suggest the importance of strengthening cross-regional collaboration, strengthening open data integration and developing AI- and IoT-enabled early warning systems to build more adaptive and climate-resilient societies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Journal of Geographical ResearchSame topicSeismology and Earthquake StudiesFrench-language works237,207