MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416729470 · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1676115

Absence of the LRRK2 mutation in Emirati Parkinson’s disease patients in contrast to other Arab populations

2025· article· en· W4416729470 on OpenAlexaff
Vinod Metta, Anjana Soorajkumar, Tom Loney, Nasna Nassir, К. Ray Chaudhuri, Mohammed Jashim Uddin, Hani T. S. Benamer

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Aging Neuroscience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsGenome Canada
FundersMohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
KeywordsLRRK2MutationDiseaseGenetic testingContrast (vision)Genetic diagnosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The role of genetic factors in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized by heterogeneity in specific genetic variations and their prevalence across different populations and geographic locations. Objective To investigate the frequency of the Leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 ( LRRK2 ) mutation, a well-known genetic risk factor for PD, within Emirati patients. Methods Emirati PD patients were recruited from the United Arab Emirates between September 2022 and May 2024. Blood samples were systematically screened for mutations across all 52 exons of the LRRK2 gene. Results The LRRK2 mutation was not detected in any of the 50 Emirati PD patients (mean age 64.2 ± 14.1 years, of whom 56% are male) examined. Conclusion The absence of the LRRK2 and specifically the G2019S mutation in Emirati PD patients corroborates findings from Saudi Arabia and indicates a distinct genetic pattern compared to other Arab regions like Egypt and Maghreb (North African) countries, where the G2019S mutation prevalence ranges from 10 to 40%. This underscores the need for further research to unveil alternative genetic determinants specific to the Emirati PD population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Aging NeuroscienceSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207