MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416730580 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1687179

Myosteatosis as an independent predictor for all-cause and cardiac mortality in initial-dialysis patients: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4416730580 on OpenAlexaff
Shi‐mei Hou, Min Li, Jingyuan Cao, Yao Wang, Min Yang, Li Tian, Yanhong Ni, Jianbing Hao, Chunbo Zou, A-Feng Miao, Chunhong Hu, Yuan Li, Jing Zheng, Jingjie Xiao, Jian Xu, Bin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCovenant Health
Funders“333 Project” of Jiangsu ProvinceJiangsu Commission of HealthNanjing Medical UniversityGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyNomogramCohort studyProportional hazards modelSurvival analysisPredictive value of tests

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Myosteatosis is associated with adverse prognosis in diseases. We aimed to establish thresholds for myosteatosis, assess its association with all-cause and cardiac mortality in initial dialysis patients, and construct a myosteatosis-based survival nomogram. assessed the predictive value of myosteatosis with all-cause and cardiac mortality in initial-dialysis patients, and constructed a myosteatosis-based survival nomogram. Methods: ) and Skeletal Muscle Density (SMD, Hounsfield Units [HU]) were measured at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) level by computed tomography (CT). Sex-specific SMI and SMD thresholds predicted all-cause mortality through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The Cox models assessed myosteatosis-associated mortality risks. Survival prediction models were built using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression in the training cohort, followed by internal and external validation. Results: Patients were predominantly aged 18-65 years (n = 298, 77.81%), with males comprising 60.84% (n = 233). All-cause mortality was 22.72% (n = 87), of which 52.87% (n = 46) were attributed to cardiac causes. Sex-specific SMD cutoffs for predicting all-cause mortality were 32.46 HU (AUC = 0.707) in males and 34.58 HU (AUC = 0.690) in females (both P < 0.05). Myosteatosis was associated with higher all-cause (36.7%) and cardiac mortality (19.8%) (both P < 0.001), and independently predicted both outcomes (all-cause mortality: HR = 3.203, 95% CI:1.937-5.296; cardiac mortality: HR = 3.418, 95% CI:1.718-6.802). The myosteatosis-based nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.761, validated in real-world data. Conclusion: Sex-specific myosteatosis thresholds (males: SMD ≤32.46 HU; females: ≤34.58 HU) derived from L3-CT independently predicted all-cause and cardiac mortality in initial-dialysis patients. The myosteatosis-based survival nomogram demonstrated moderate-to-good predictive accuracy and potential clinical utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Physiology→Same topicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→