MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416730602 · doi:10.3389/fendo.2025.1700844

Vitamin D supplementation and its impact on leptin and interleukin-6 in women following religious intermittent fasting: a controlled study

2025· article· en· W4416730602 on OpenAlexaff
Spyridon Ν. Karras, Konstantinos Michalakis, Maria Kypraiou, Fatme Al Anouti, Hana Fakhoury, Cédric Annweiler, Stefan Pilz, Marios Anemoulis, Antonios Vlastos, Costas Haitoglou, Uwe Riedmann, Neoklis A. Georgopoulos, Evangelos Papanikolaou, Georgios Tzimagiorgis

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Endocrinology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDietary Effects on Health
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptinVitamin D and neurologyvitamin D deficiencyVitaminAffect (linguistics)Obesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Vitamin D deficiency is highly prevalent in populations following intermittent or religious fasting, particularly Orthodox nuns with limited sun exposure and dietary restrictions. Vitamin D may modulate adipokines and inflammatory markers, but clinical evidence remains inconsistent. Objective To investigate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on interleukin-6 (IL-6) and leptin concentrations in Orthodox nuns compared with non-supplemented controls. Methods In this controlled, non-randomized trial, 33 Orthodox nuns received oral vitamin D 3 supplementation (2,500 IU/day) for 16 weeks, while 42 age-matched women following Orthodox intermittent fasting served as controls. Anthropometric indices and serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], IL-6, leptin, parathyroid hormone, insulin, and C-reactive protein were measured at baseline and follow-up. Results At baseline, serum 25(OH)D concentrations were lower in the supplementation group compared with controls (23.4 ± 10.1 vs . 27.7 ± 11.2 ng/mL, p = 0.043). After 16 weeks, 25(OH)D increased significantly in the supplementation group (23.4 ± 10.1 vs . 33.9 ± 11.0 ng/mL, p < 0.001), with no change in controls (27.7 ± 11.2 vs . 28.5 ± 12.2 ng/mL, p = 0.941). Leptin showed a non-significant decrease in the supplementation group (24.4 ± 18.3 vs . 21.9 ± 13.5 ng/mL, p = 0.215), whereas in the controls, it remained unchanged (23.21 ± 14.67 vs . 24.05 ± 13.89 pg/mL, p = 0.365). IL-6 did not change significantly in either group. Exploratory multivariable regression did not reveal significant predictors of leptin changes. Conclusions Vitamin D supplementation effectively corrected deficiency but did not significantly affect leptin or IL-6 concentrations. These results highlight the need for larger and longer studies to further clarify the immunometabolic impact of vitamin D supplementation in women practicing intermittent fasting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in EndocrinologySame topicDietary Effects on HealthFrench-language works237,207