MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416731256 · doi:10.33546/bnj.3784

Cognitive function and dementia risk factors among older people in nursing homes: An observational cohort study in Medan, Indonesia

2025· article· en· W4416731256 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Siska Evi Martina, Fasihah Irfani Fitri, Alexander F.K. Sibero, AMILA AMILA

Bibliographic record

VenueBelitung Nursing Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDirektorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi
KeywordsDementiaCognitionObservational studyOlder peopleCohort studyIdentification (biology)Nursing homesCognitive impairmentCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Indonesia’s rapidly aging demographic presents significant challenges, particularly in dementia among older people in resource‐limited settings, such as nursing homes. However, there are limited reports on the deterioration of cognitive function and risk factors of dementia among older people in nursing homes. Early identification of dementia is essential for timely intervention and management. Objective: This study aimed to investigate and follow up on the cognitive function and risk factors of dementia among older people living in nursing homes. Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted over 6 months (April to October 2024) involving 162 participants from government (n = 83) and private nursing homes (n = 79). Implementation of early dementia screening was carried out using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in the Indonesian version (MoCA INA) instrument to indicate cognitive function impairment. In addition, the Self-reporting of Physical Activity Questionnaire Indonesia (SPAQ-I) was used to identify physical activity. Descriptive statistics, McNemar, Chi-square, Fisher’s Exact, Independent t-test, and multivariate regression were then used to analyze data. Results: Older individuals did not differ in terms of gender, age, education, or length of stay. However, residents of the private nursing home had significantly higher physical activity levels (t = -2.04, p = 0.040), and a greater proportion engaged in adequate activity (65.8% vs. 50.6%, χ² = 4.23, p = 0.040). Over a six-month period, cognitive function significantly declined among residents in the government nursing home (normal: p = 0.021; mild: p = 0.012; moderate: p = 0.003), whereas no significant change was observed among residents in the private nursing home. At the endpoint, mean cognitive function scores were slightly higher in the private nursing home (20.23 ± 3.45) than in the government nursing home (19.70 ± 4.39), with a very small effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.13). Multiple regression analysis revealed that older age (β = -0.396, p <0.001) and lower levels of physical activity (β = 0.163, p = 0.030) were significantly associated with lower cognitive scores. Conclusion: Dementia screening can enhance care planning for age-related cognitive impairment by enabling early identification and management. Early detection allows nurses to implement more effective care strategies. Additionally, higher physical activity levels were associated with better cognitive function, highlighting a modifiable factor that may help maintain cognitive health among older adults in nursing homes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBelitung Nursing JournalSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207